A little over a week ago I launched this site with the simple hope of starting a conversation to learn why certain civic leaders think it’s a good idea to spend $1.2 billion to replace an airport that, according to a recent poll, 70% of us like and don’t want replaced. It’s been an excellent conversation to date with polite and civil discourse from both sides.
I’ve read all of the nearly 200 comments and postings to date. I’ve looked at and researched other airports around the country at the suggestion of posters. I’ve even read the 2006 New Century AirCenter Master Plan from the Johnson County Airport Commission.
I still don’t get it.
Regardless of whether I look at the reasons for building it or the speculation as to how it will be paid for, the numbers still don’t add up. So what is it? Is it just a bad case of “Airport Envy?”
I’ve lived here my entire life. I get how this town has always suffered from a “cowtown” inferiority complex. Regardless of how great Kansas City is, we refuse to see ourselves as just as pretty as the girl standing next to us. We might be nicer, smarter, more naturally beautiful, have a better sense of humor and a vastly superior sense of charity and caring, but by golly Buffy over there just had some cosmetic work done (because she stole Daddy’s credit card) and so we need to also if we ever want to be asked out.
To quote the noble Colonel Sherman Potter, “Horse Hockey!”
In fairness, our city leaders travel all over the country – as city leaders. They walk through airports, downtowns, river walks, stadiums and such and it’s only natural that they look at those facilities from a unique perspective. I’m simply asking them to overcome the “No fair, I want one of these” emotions and be smart leaders, not just another set of copycats. Remember that Kansas City is a great city. People want to move here to raise families.
But there are also 29 cities that are larger than we are. This brings two sets of realities. The first is that we don’t have a lot of the problems that other cities have. (But if we keep focusing on “me-too” projects at the expense of the social issues that cropped up again over the weekend, we soon will.) The second is that we don’t have the financial resources to satisfy every jealous urge.
Cities, just like individuals and businesses, that don’t have infinite resources need to think harder and be smarter than others.
For example, the consultant last week suggested looking at Austin, Sacramento and Indianapolis as markets where new terminals worked. I did and some of those findings have been reported elsewhere on this site. But something else about those airports was not noted. None of them border on a competitive state.
Currently the New Century airport in Olathe is not planning on seeking commercial traffic. This could change. The runway is already long enough and most importantly, airlines are now moving more and more traffic to regional carriers with smaller jets. This means to be profitable, they only have to find 50 people who want to fly to Chicago rather than 120. And since KCI’s passenger studies reveal that half of the current air traffic comes from JoCo, this would not be too hard.
Johnson County would not have to build anything fancy. I’ve flown into Central Wisconsin airport and Bangor, Maine, both of which are simple, easy, fast and built on a budget. If I work in the Lenexa, Olathe, South OP area, why would I want to drive 30-45 minutes each way to KCI and fight the crowds at the new combined security checkpoint, the new shopping concourse and make a longer walk to the gate to hop on a commuter jet when I can scoot over to Olathe and be half way to Chicago or Dallas at the same time I would be boarding my plane at KCI. All of a sudden saving a couple of hours, saving gas and a no hassle terminal in Olathe looks like a smart option to passengers, a revenue poacher for the county and full planes for the airlines.
So while we are told to fear Branson, St. Louis and even Columbia, I would be more concerned about our friends across the state line. Again, for now it’s not in their master plan but that plan is aging, there is a new spirit of cross-border business raiding and the South Johnson County population has continued to grow. KCI’s current convenience and offerings still provide a superior overall option – for now.
If Kansas City is going to change anything about KCI for “competitive” reasons, let’s make sure we are looking at ALL the competitors. Let’s also make sure that the biggest competitor is not simply our own ego.
I am planning my first flight into KCI next week from Atlanta. I have no vested interest in the airport there and I’m only curious about this topic as a general interest in commercial aviation.
That being said, I think there is a general premise of this article that is incorrect and undermines the some of the argument made. Airlines are not moving TOWARDS more regional jets. On the contrary, they’re moving AWAY from them. Delta, for example, is planning on eliminating every single CRJ from its fleet. In fact, this process has already started as they are swapping those routes with B-717s acquired from AirTran.
When done, Delta will have no plane under 100 seats. The cost of fuel now compared to when the CRJs first became popular is significantly higher and makes operating any plane with less than 75 seats uneconomical. The overall plan is to fly as many people as they currently do with fewer flights given the capacity per flight will increase.
That being said, 100 different passengers are going to be best served in a larger centralized airport than they would by going to a remote regional airport. One might find 40-ish passengers who’d be happy to fly out of Kansas on a given flight, but when the number climbs over 100, then the greater geography needs to be better represented.
Lastly, I have flown through DFW a ton and I think that is the absolute worst airport. While I haven’t hit KCI yet, I’ve read where it employs a similar design. Where Atlanta, Denver, Indianapolis, and others have both sides of the concourse lined with gates, the single-sided ring design is a gross waste of space. Again, DFW as a model, transferring flights there is painful as each step down the concourse is passing only one gate at a time rather than knocking them out by twos. I would hope the folks in KC would aspire to a better design if not a better facility.
How does spending 1.2 billion dollars, to take hundreds of jobs away make sense? .
We’ve flown out of KC for years and love the ease of getting in and out fast and safe. Cutting security means less instant response to emergency happenings at the airport and longer lines. In turn unhappy customers. And Who pays for the New Age Airport? We do! The customers with higher prices at the ticket counter and shops in the airport. Our piece of mind gone.
We travel hundreds of miles to get to the KC airport , we use hotels, eat at restaurants and shop. It is closer to Wichita and Lincoln airports for the people in our area. Without the safe calm atmosphere, there’s no need to take the extra time to fly with KC.
I am saddened by the decisions of a few grasping to save money in all the wrong places. How many years of not paying those wages of the people losing jobs will it take to pay off the 1.2 billion airport?
Where’s the petition? I’ll sign it right now. Since day one of this non-sense being discussed, I’ve been against it. I lived in Denver for several years and traveled back to KC several times per year. Travelling through DIA was the absolute worst part about my trips every time!
A better plan can be derived while maintaining the convenience of our airport system. I live close to the airport and have to listen to the jets flyover frequently enough. If this plan is to bring in more airlines, that means air traffic noise will increase significantly.
Airports aren’t supposed to be major shopping centers. Adding airlines, shopping, restaurants and bars will slow the passengers that just want to get where they are going.
After a trip through several U.S. airports recently, returning to KCI, as always, was wonderful. No moving sidewalks. No feedlot type cattle chutes jamming hundreds through single security checks. No escalators, elevators, mile hikes to ground transportation or bag claim. Off the jet, 100 steps later with my bag on the blue bus to parking.
Seems a majority share this favorable opinion, which our aviation department must realize. But if the agenda is to spend a billion on a single terminal, replacing one of the most user friendly airports in the country for the people that live here, run it so folks won’t feel that way. If it’s not broke, break it. Isn’t change good? Is that why Terminal B is left overcrowded while other terminals have excess capacity? During the week B garage parking is usually full, while A and C have thousands of spaces. The planned closing of Terminal A will make the airport seem more crowded and less convenient, reinforcing the case for a replacement terminal.
After all, a single terminal is more convenient for security, businesses, and people just passing through can have a shopping mall /restaurant venue. That way we can cater to the traveler in transit, just making connections through our airport, at the expense of the people who live here. Is that what we need to do? The airport mission to provide user friendly, convenient air travel to people of the region is just a secondary consideration, right?
It is about time that JoCo steps up and pays for some of the areas amenities. If we have to have a new airport, let’s work to insure it is in Johnson County.
Um, JoCo residents pay for plenty of your area amenities. My Jackson County income taxes help pay for the JackCo schools and utilities. And KCMO takes another 1% off the top, to boot. Every time I fly out of KCI, I pay airport utilization fees (that pay for old KCI and new KCI, by the way). Every time I go to the Sprint Center, I pay ticket fees and sales tax. Every time my family eats and shops on the Plaza, we pay taxes. I pay tuition at UMKC. God forbid I choose to live and pay property tax (the one tax JackCo can’t levy against me) somewhere else.
Enjoy your Mad Men airport for another couple of years.
Few more articles with cautionary tales:
http://www.indianapolisairport.com/admin/uploads/714/2011CAFR.pdf – overall financial report from Indy airport (2011)
http://business.highbeam.com/5280/article-1G1-292086129/airport-faces-fiscal-headwinds-board-president-quest – talking about how a decline in traffic has forced the airport to find other revenue streams
I fly in & out of MCI weekly and agree with other posters about how easy it is to get in and out of the airport. Convenient covered parking is literally an escalator ride away from the gate.
A few minor and relatively inexpensive modifications can deal with restroom and dining issues. The Southwest terminal is a good example of this.
MCI is not a hub airport so I’m not sure what the dining issue even is. It’s not like there is a good reason to sit inside security for hours on end. Besides, I rarely wait more than 5 minutes to get through security anyway so just go outside security and eat wherever you want if your flight is delayed.
A lot of people mentioned the Sacramento situation, which is my biggest concern. If we fall victim to what has happened there, we will be in big trouble. Let’s hope officials don’t walk us into a mess like that.
http://www.businessinsider.com/sacramento-is-opening-a-1-billion-art-filled-terminal-2011-10
I just flew into KCI today in fact … and it took me less than 10 minutes to get to the curb, checked bag in hand. This airport has always worked perfectly for me, and while it’s not the prettiest, I often brag about it to my friends in other cities who spend 50% more time than I do.
It’s the money. ALWAYS the money. Government leaders justifying their existence. I’ve noticed the revenues for the Power and Light District are not meeting expectations. Surprise!
I’ve done my share of traveling and there has been no other airport that has been as easy to get into, board and deplane than KCI. It is great that you don’t have to walk a country mile to get to the baggage claims, and that you can walk right off the plane and be in front of waiting family or on the curb in less than 5 minutes. Apparently whoever is behind this insane waste of money has not heard of the saying, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!”
Follow the money. How many of those civic leaders have connections to contractors who see a gold mine out there. I travelled all over the country for 35 years. I always have loved coming home to KCI.
While I like the Idea of an flight right out of Olathe – I almost would rather have a train that goes from the depths of Johnson County into the City and to the Airport.
I know nothing of the cost/economics of such a thing – but after spending 16mo in the Suburbs of Chicago the Train seems like the thing to tie everything together, without sacrificing the best things of our city.
There are reasons not to trust anything Mark VanLoh says whether it sounds plausible or not.
We were told that there was no infrastructure available to allow for restrooms inside secured areas. After hundreds of complaints, restrooms magically appeared.
VanLoh authorized the construction on Muslim foot washing basins at the cab stand near the tower and sent his PR person out to claim that the basins were installed so cab drivers could wash their vehicles. Later I was by a person employed by the airport authority that the basins were installed because cab drivers kept trying to stick their feet in the sinks and the weight of their legs had pulled sinks from the walls. Wouldn’t it have been better to tell the truth rather than hide behind a lie?
I was also told by that employee that VanLoh considers vendors and airlines to be his constituency. Passenger convenience takes a back seat to the wants and needs of the airlines and other vendors.
VanLoh’s resignation from his previous position in Chatanooga leaves doubts as to whether he was fired or resigned. The quote from his statement upon leaving his position in Chatanooga rings hollow given that his resignation was effective immediately and was named to his current position 10 weeks later. Evidently soon after he resigned, he no longer wanted to purse interests in the city he had grown to love.
Airport CEO Mark VanLoh Resigns
The Chattanoogan, TN
February 10, 2004
Mark VanLoh, president and chief executive officer of
the Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport Authority,
submitted his resignation to the airport’s board of
directors Tuesday afternoon effective immediately.
He has served in that position since August 2001.
He said, “In the last two-and-a-half years, we have
been able to get a lot accomplished, including more
reliable air service, as well as new service to New
York, the number one destination in the country.
However, at this juncture in my career, I want to
pursue other professional opportunities in the
Chattanooga area, which my family and I have grown to
love.”