C heck this one off the list… Finally.

Did Russ Johnson really abstain after his committee recommended, “Do Pass?”

Today’s press release from Citizens for Responsible Government/Friends of KCI:

CFRG release

UPDATE AND CLARIFICATION: A check of the Council minutes shows that Councilman Johnson DID abstain on the ordinance that guarantees a vote on airport demolition or construction. He voted to pass the airline lease extension at KCI wherein the airlines are finally able to offer serious input and guidance on the future of KCI. (Thanks to Yael Abouhalkah for tweeting me the link to the Council minutes.)

Tags: , ,

2 Responses to “City Council Passes Ordinance Requiring Vote On KCI” Subscribe

  1. Bill Mullins February 22, 2014 at 9:23 am #

    Given this change in the critical path to authorization of any dramatic change in KCI Architecture – wouldn’t it be great if the ATAG leadership were to take a mental pause, shift into the deliberation toward closure on policy advising and then use a couple of public meetings to brief the stakeholders on how this process has:
    1) Learned as it went a long;
    2) Developed a balanced recommendation that is sound for the entire Region,
    3) Demonstrated a heretofore unprecedented alternative to the Decide Announce Defend strategy recently employed by VanLoh/Johnson and the proponents of the ill-fated Medical Research Tax.

    And as a bonus,
    4) Employed Mind Mixer type social media digital engagement to actually monitor public reaction beginning before the roll out of steps 1) – 3).[Well a boy can dream! :)]

  2. Mark March 15, 2014 at 12:41 pm #

    Watching this whole pre-determined outcome rollout from City Hall is sad but even sadder is that we have come to expect such behavior from elected officials. Why must we fight for an honest approach to problem solving instead of being dictated to and expected to accept whatever we are handed.

    KCI is extremely convenient to use as is but it needs some updating. OK, we get that part. But why is it that everytime a ‘consultant’ is hired to ‘do a study’ the end result seems to be a ‘new building’? Haven’t we learned that energy resources are not endless? Haven’t we learned that materials are becoming more costly and need to be used more wisely? A new terminal would likely require the complete demolition of the existing terminals depending on the outcome of the new design. A new terminal would require that it be finished 100% before it could be used whereas major renovations to one of the existing terminals could commence as soon as design is completed and the other two terminals could be kept open. I also seem to recall a comment by the so-called ‘consultant’ that seemed to be slamming the opponents of a new terminal by saying that updating the old terminals would result in unneccessary expenses and undesirable outcomes. I would suggest that such a statement was made by a person with limited imagination and is again indicative of a pre-determined outcome approach. When will we learn that the answer to every poroblem is not to tear it down and build a new one? Does anyone remember the consultants who concluded that Union Station be torn down? I believe that consultants are often nothing more than third-party mouthpieces for the powers that be and the consultants will sing any tune they need to sing to earn a fee.

    I want to see ideas on using the existing buildings from the public, from high school and college classes, from local architecture firms or anyone else who thinks they have a solution. Soliciting input from 10,000 sources just might result in a broader vision and better solution than asking only a handful of insiders what they think. Unless of course the ‘consultants’ have already determined that nobody else can come up with a better solution. And the solutions also need to take into account the demolition costs of any component because the public needs the entire picture not just part of it. Having a design competition would not be the first of it’s kind. Or are we in a rush to judgement to satisfy a promise to a union in exchange for campaign funding?

Leave a Reply

The Pitch Throws A Tight Curve On Eve Of ATAG Report

I’m told that the Airport Terminal Advisory Group co-chairs and our consultants have completed or are nearing completion on the […]

And So Ends The First Period

Today’s announcement of the ATAG vote is newsworthy as much for the misreporting as for the announcement itself. The group […]

Time Flies, But Ill-Conceived Terminal Proposals Do Not.

Today marks the one-year anniversary of starting this website. A year of my life that I will never get back, […]

A Realistic Look At KCI Retail

IMG_5985

There’s a nicely balanced (gasp) piece in the KC Star today discussion the question of retail amenities at KCI. This […]

City Council Passes Ordinance Requiring Vote On KCI

Check this one off the list… Finally. Did Russ Johnson really abstain after his committee recommended, “Do Pass?” Today’s press […]

Reality Finally Lands At Our KCI Discussion.

Today was a big day. Today¬†we finally learned from the airlines themselves that not only would a shiny new terminal […]

Correcting The Narrative.

I admit it. I screwed up. I assumed when Aviation Dept officials and others said or implied that there were […]

KCI Consultant Was Right After All. We Should Look At Sacramento.

Way back in early April at the Council hearing, the Aviation Department’s consultant Mark Perryman suggested that Kansas City look […]

Your Questions For The Airlines

As you know, there was a bomb threat this morning just as the Airport Advisory Group was beginning to hear […]

Facts Support The “Nanny Naysayers”

There was a rather remarkable discussion of KCI on KCPT’s Ruckus last week. For one thing, liberal pundit Mary O’Halloran […]

KCPT Pundits Agree It’s Time For Us To Put Brakes On Terminal Plan.

As noted earlier, Southwest’s very public entry into the KCI terminal discussion is a game-changer.  

It’s Official. Southwest Doesn’t Like The New Terminal Proposal.

This really doesn’t come as a surprise to those of us who have truly approached this issue with an open […]

LAX Tragedy Offers Security Lessons To KCI Planners.

KCI lines

The security configuration at KCI has been near the center of terminal planning discussions since the beginning.¬†Proponents of a single […]

So Where Are the REAL Alternatives?

From the beginning, I’ve said that I’m not against a new terminal at KCI per se, but rather that most […]

A KCI For The Future

Ok, I finally found an airport I like even better than KCI. The time from curb to gate was not […]

The Joy Of Obsolete Convenience

A caption under a photo in the Star today was thought-provoking in several ways. First, I see they are still […]

Airport School – Home Study Course

As you’ve likely read, “Airport School” is officially over for the Mayor’s Airport Terminal Advisory Group (aka Task Force, aka […]

We Need A Branded Terminal, Not A Brand New One

Last May, as I was walking to my car following the mayor’s press conference announcing the formation of the Airport […]